<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GPGPU &#187; Tag: Precision :: GPGPU.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gpgpu.org/tag/precision/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gpgpu.org</link>
	<description>General-Purpose Computation on Graphics Hardware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Numerical Precision: How Much is Enough?</title>
		<link>http://gpgpu.org/2009/06/30/scientific-computing-numerical-precision</link>
		<comments>http://gpgpu.org/2009/06/30/scientific-computing-numerical-precision#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interval Arithmetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixed-precision arithmetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numerics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpgpu.org/?p=1723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A ScientificComputing.com article by Rob Farber explores the topic of numerical precision in the context of future exascale computing, asking the question &#8220;how do we know that anything we compute is correct?&#8221;  The discussion centers around processors such as GPUs which provide both single- and double-precision computation but at different throughput levels. &#8220;Taking a multi-precision [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.scientificcomputing.com/article-hpc-Numerical-Precision-How-Much-is-Enough-063009.aspx" target="_blank">ScientificComputing.com article</a> by Rob Farber explores the topic of numerical precision in the context of future exascale computing, asking the question &#8220;how do we know that anything we compute is correct?&#8221;  The discussion centers around processors such as GPUs which provide both single- and double-precision computation but at different throughput levels. &#8220;Taking a multi-precision approach can enhance the accuracy of a calculation and justify the use of mainly single-precision arithmetic (for performance) along with the occasional use of double-precision (64-bit) arithmetic for precision-sensitive operations,&#8221; writes Farber. (Rob Farber.<a href="http://www.scientificcomputing.com/article-hpc-Numerical-Precision-How-Much-is-Enough-063009.aspx" target="_blank"> &#8220;Numerical Precision: How Much is Enough?&#8221;</a> ScientificComputing.com.  Accessed July 1, 2008.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gpgpu.org/2009/06/30/scientific-computing-numerical-precision/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Native, emulated and mixed precision schemes</title>
		<link>http://gpgpu.org/2007/03/13/native-emulated-and-mixed-precision-schemes</link>
		<comments>http://gpgpu.org/2007/03/13/native-emulated-and-mixed-precision-schemes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floating Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numerical Algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpgpu.org/cgi-bin/blosxom.cgi/ScientificComputing/NumericalAlgorithms/goeddekeIJPEDS06.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This survey paper by D. Göddeke and R. Strzodka compares native double precision solvers for linear systems of equations as they typically arise in finite element discretizations with emulated- and mixed-precision schemes. Such schemes are particularly suitable for coupled hardware configurations such as GPUs and FPGAs, which serve as co-processors to the general purpose CPU. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This survey paper by D. Göddeke and R. Strzodka compares native double precision solvers for linear systems of equations as they typically arise in finite element discretizations with emulated- and mixed-precision schemes. Such schemes are particularly suitable for coupled hardware configurations such as GPUs and FPGAs, which serve as co-processors to the general purpose CPU. The results demonstrate that</p>
<ol>
<li> accuracy is preserved even for very ill-conditioned systems,</li>
<li>significant speedups can be achieved (time aspect, GPUs) and</li>
<li>area requirements are reduced (space aspect, FPGA).</li>
</ol>
<p>(<a href="http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~goeddeke/pubs/ijpeds06.html" target="_blank">link/preprint</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gpgpu.org/2007/03/13/native-emulated-and-mixed-precision-schemes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

